Slutwalk

 

The term ‘SlutWalk’ first appeared as a blip on my radar around June or August. The term piqued my interest and I began to  read about the basics of what a ‘SlutWalk’ was supposed to be. The entire phenomena started in January when Constable Michael Sanguinetti of the Toronto Police told students at a local university that, “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized”. While the officer went on to apologize for his words a few days later, they’d already drawn attention from women’s rights activists who were outraged that Sanguinetti had seen fit to place the blame for such a heinous crime on the victim.  In response, feminists Sonya Barnett and Heather Jarvis co-founded a SlutWalk protest march in Toronto that sought to fight back against what they saw as the Toronto police department’s, and in extension, a patriarchal society’s scapegoating of women.

          Ever since that first SlutWalk in April, the movement has spread internationally. I’ve been aware, for a long while now, of society’s inherent bias against women in the workplace and in society at large, but it took the spread of the SlutWalk phenomena for me to see how prevalent these issues were. Women across continents — in the US, in London, in India, in South Africa– have all found a reason to take up the cause. It is a well-known fact that women earn seventy-seven cents (or less, depending on race) for every dollar that a male earns for comparable work (1). Females also have a harder time attaining executive positions (2) and pursuing careers in male-heavy math and science fields (3).  And if you are aware of any religion that  asks a man look towards his wife for guidance, I would really love to hear  about it.  Women, it seems to me, face the challenges of sexism both at work and at home.  While all these issues are regularly on the feminist agenda, the immediate message of the Slutwalks has been far simpler: “Don’t tell us what to wear! Tell men not to rape!”

          Women have, for ages, been given the message that what they’re wearing is inappropriate; those skirts too short, that salwar kameez too tight. Constable Sanguinetti seems to be only one of many people who feel that if a woman is showing skin, she is at least partly to blame for the rape. Even in the US,  rape cases are notoriously under-reported, because many women are afraid of the reaction from a society that engages in victim blaming (4). In more patriarchal societies, attaining justice seems damn near impossible (5).  But in such societies, even wearing a burqa isn’t a guarantee that you’re safe from this kind of sexual harassment and assault (6).  Government and religious institutions, too, are guilty of standing idly by or actively covering up this crime.  I find it inspiring to see women now speak out against the status quo en masse.

          But what’s been even more interesting to me, however, is how the women participating in these marches are responding to each other and our gender’s ideas on what it means to be a strong, independent woman. The SlutWalk coordinators, for example, talk about taking back the word ‘slut’. While I agree that the name ‘SlutWalk’ is cheeky and brings some much needed attention to these issues, I and a lot of other women would never feel comfortable identifying ourselves by that term.  Another fascinating example of this ideological conflict within in the movement comes from an article titled ‘An Open Letter from Black Women to the SlutWalk’ (7). While this moving piece of writing is worth reading in its entirety, the following words stood out most strongly to me.

As Black women and girls we find no space in SlutWalk, no space for participation and to unequivocally denounce rape and sexual assault as we have experienced it.  We are perplexed by the use of the term “slut” and by any implication that this word, much like the word “Ho” or the “N” word should be re-appropriated. [...]  We don’t have the privilege to play on destructive representations burned in our collective minds, on our bodies and souls for generations. [...]It is tied to institutionalized ideology about our bodies as sexualized objects of property, as spectacles of sexuality and deviant sexual desire. It is tied to notions about our clothed or unclothed bodies as unable to be raped whether on the auction block, in the fields or on living room television screens.

What has been most gratifying, however, are the conversations I have been able to have with friends as I worked on this article. Suddenly the topic was being brought up at the dinner table and both my male and female friends were eager to add their opinions to the mix. While everybody was content to agree that rape was a terrible crime, they weren’t sure who to place the blame on. Many of them (the girls included) argued that the rapists were mostly responsible, but felt that the female victims also had a certain degree of culpability.  What if, they asked, she made the mistake of walking all alone at night? What if she was wearing short skirts? Didn’t that mean that she wanted to be looked at? Touched? Wasn’t she clearly being a tease?  I wasn’t thrilled to hear these questions because in this day and age it should be clear to everyone that the answer is a big resounding NO. But I was glad that at least we were having these conversations; that I had the chance to bring forth my own arguments and change their minds.  While I ultimately don’t align myself with Slutwalk’s methods, I do support their message.

salwar kameez – a traditional South Asian dress consisting of loose trousers and a long tunic
burqa – an outer garment worn by Muslim women to fully cover their bodies

1) http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1983185,00.html
(2)http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/194188/20110808/female-chief-executives-us-europe-pay-gap-norway.htm
(3)http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/175243-commerce-chief-lack-of-women-in-stem-is-unacceptable
(4) http://judiciary.senate.gov/pdf/10-09-14KilpatrickTestimony.pdf
(5)http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/world/asia/rape-case-is-a-rarity-in-chinese-justice-system.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
(6)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatif_girl_rape_case
(7)http://newblackman.blogspot.com/2011/09/open-letter-from-black-women-to.html?spref=fb

Photo Credit: Francesa June
[Note: I was able to get in touch with one of the former organizers of Slutwalk NYC with regards to the featured picture and she asked me to point out that the subject of the photograph is a trans*boy -- a reminder that rape is a problem that people of all genders face.]


About Srujana Lam :
Srujana Lam is majoring in chemical engineering and is having a fantastic time as the current Associate Editor-in-Chief. She has a gigantic sweet tooth and is currently obsessed with shows on the BBC. Her favorite genres are fantasy and sci-fi, and she is currently making her way through a long list of Western classics.
View all posts by Srujana Lam
Previous postLately Next postIn Palon Ko Thaam Lo (Hold on to These Moments)

6 comments

  1. Sumita says:

    Jan 30, 2012

    Reply

    To be honest, I sort of thought the event was a sarcastic use of the word “slut”, where perfectly respectable women walk around educating people about the fact that a) often rape has nothing to do with physical lust and the amount of skin you’re showing, and b) that a crime is a crime, no matter what the girl is wearing.

    I was also hoping for a summary of how you managed to change the minds of those you spoke with. What do you think is the main reason people hold these views about blame — misguided religious beliefs, habit, misogyny…?

    • Srujana says:

      Feb 3, 2012

      Reply

      When I first started researching the SlutWalk, I thought they were being hilariously sarcastic too. But the more I read, the more I began to realize that maybe some of these women were (in a misguided attempt) actually trying to reclaim this word and “own” it. The ‘Open Letter from Black Women’ only cemented this idea for me because as far as I understand it, black feminist leaders did originally reach out to SlutWalk organizers (who appear to be overwhelmingly white) to discuss their very valid concerns about the use of the word ‘slut’. However, they were cruelly rebuffed and vilified by certain organizers who saw it only as an attempt to tarnish the almost rosy image that SlutWalk was enjoying up till that point.

      I’m not sure if I did manage to change any minds actually; although I’m not sure whether it was because my arguments lack a certain eloquence or because I just didn’t spend enough time on the subject. I talked to a lot of people who were on the opposite side of this issue, and I think that their main reason for disagreeing with me was a misogynistic mindset that has been ingrained in them by a patriarchal society, and is now practically a habit. All of them, males and females alike, were okay with using the ‘skin triggers rape’ argument.

  2. martinho says:

    Jan 31, 2012

    Reply

    Rape is absolutely heinous. At the same time, in the real world, skin showing can trigger rape. These are two different issues – the first one is an ideal, and the second is an event (triggering). Minimizing the chances of rape requires focussing on both…i suppose thats what the Toronto police officer may have been getting at, although he badly expressed his view.

    • Srujana says:

      Feb 3, 2012

      Reply

      I agree that it’s not only practical, but necessary, that women learn to protect themselves from rapists and other criminals. This means taking self-defense lessons, carrying pepper spray, taking a pal along for a night out on the town, etc. But I vehemently have to disagree with your assessment that showing skin triggers anything. The Qatif rape case I reference (link 6) is a case where the female victim was covered head-to-toe as is generally the case in Saudi Arabia. Which bit of her body triggered that gang-rape? Or what about the subject in the photo above? Was he raped because of his face or his elbows?

      The entire trigger argument is one long, slippery slope. You ask me to wear turtlenecks because my shirt is too low cut. Then you ask me to wear pants because even relatively modest knee-length skirts are showing off my legs. Then what? Should I cover my face with a burqa because it is too alluring? If the Qatif case indicates anything, it is that men who want to rape will find an excuse to rape. Let us not belittle the intelligence of males or excuse them from their actions by claiming that they are incapable of controlling themselves.

      —Srujana, Author

  3. Anand says:

    Feb 15, 2012

    Reply

    Ladies, while I implore you all to protest people calling you sluts for having been raped, please don’t go out on the limb of wearing miniskirts down dark alleys at night to make your point. There are a few of us men who aren’t misogynists and rather like you.

  4. Yusuf says:

    Feb 22, 2012

    Reply

    A Lebanese firend of mine shared your article on facebook and I did too. Thanks for writing this, for being so un-Lebanese in discussing this sad story. Please don’t stop thinking, speaking and writing in this utterly human manner.

What do you think?

Name required

Website

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>